[When to resume driving after primary total hip arthroplasty?] / ¿Cuándo se reanuda la conducción después del reemplazo total de cadera primario?

INTRODUCTION: the current literature relates the return to driving with multiple variables. For various reasons, the current data on the time to return to driving after a total hip arthroplasty (THA) are diverse and even contradictory. We have proposed the objective of determining the time required to drive a manual gear vehicle again in a group of patients who underwent primary THA through a posterolateral approach with focus on manual gear cars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: we have studied the functional results of 112 patients who underwent primary THA between January 2019 and January 2020 in a high level in Cadiz, Andalusia, Spain. RESULTS: the median return to driving was three weeks (IQR 2-4). We have identified that 89.3% of the patients were able to drive again before the sixth week after surgery and in 92% of the cases they did so feeling even safer than before the THA. CONCLUSION: we consider that after the sixth week of an THA it is safe to resume driving a vehicle.

INTRODUCCIÓN: la literatura actual relaciona el regreso a la conducción vehicular con múltiples variables. Sin embargo, los datos actuales sobre el tiempo de regreso a la conducción luego de una artroplastía total de cadera (ATC) son diversos e incluso contradictorios. Por lo tanto, nos hemos planteado el objetivo de determinar el tiempo requerido para volver a conducir en un grupo de pacientes sometidos a una ATC primaria mediante un abordaje posterolateral, centrándonos específicamente en vehículos de marcha manual. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: hemos estudiado los resultados clínico-funcionales de 112 pacientes sometidos a una ATC primaria entre Enero de 2019 y Enero de 2020 en un hospital de alta complejidad en Cádiz, Andalucía, España. RESULTADOS: la mediana del tiempo de regreso a la conducción fue de tres semanas (RIC 2-4). Hemos identificado que 89.3% de los pacientes pudo volver a conducir antes de la sexta semana posterior a la cirugía. Además, en 92% de los casos, los pacientes se sintieron aún más seguros al conducir después de la ATC que antes de la intervención. CONCLUSIÓN: consideramos que a la sexta semana de una ATC es seguro reanudar la conducción de un vehículo.

[Preliminary results of hybrid fixation modular implant in revision knee arthroplasty]. / Resultados preliminares de la artroplastía de revisión de rodilla con implante modular de fijación híbrida.

INTRODUCTION: revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging procedure that requires proper alignment, restoration of bone loss, and prevention of instability. Modern revision systems offer progressive implant constriction with multiple options for offset, augmentation, and fixation stems. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a modular implant with hybrid fixation in revision TKA with a minimum follow-up of two years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: we retrospectively included all revision TKA surgeries performed between September 2018 and September 2019, using the same implant. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and data on bone defects were recorded. Clinical outcomes were assessed using subjective roles and Maudsley scores and the Knee Society Score (KSS). Complications during follow-up were also documented. RESULTS: a total of 23 patients were analyzed, comprising 65% females and 35% males, with a median age of 71.1 years. Bone defects following implant removal were classified as F2.T2 in 39.13% of cases, F1.T2 in 8.69%, and F1.T1 in the remaining 52.17%. There were significant improvements in the KSS score (preoperative: 53 points, postoperative: 79 points; p < 0.001). Three (13%) complications were reported, two of which were directly related to the surgery, and two patients required subsequent revision surgery. The 2-year survival rate was 91.3%. CONCLUSION: the use of a modular implant with hybrid fixation in revision TKA demonstrated a high 2-year survival rate, significant improvements in clinical scores, and a low incidence of short-term complications. These findings support the efficacy and safety of this approach, providing favorable clinical outcomes and high patient satisfaction.

INTRODUCCIÓN: la artroplastía total de rodilla (ATR) de revisión es un procedimiento desafiante que requiere alineación adecuada, restauración ósea y estabilidad. Los sistemas modernos de revisión ofrecen opciones de implantes modulares con fijación híbrida. OBJETIVO: evaluar los resultados clínicos de un implante modular de fijación híbrida con seguimiento mínimo de dos años. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: se incluyeron retrospectivamente cirugías de revisión de ATR realizadas entre Septiembre de 2018 y Septiembre de 2019 con el mismo implante. Se registraron datos demográficos, comorbilidades y se evaluaron los resultados clínicos utilizando puntuaciones subjetivas y la Knee Society Score (KSS). RESULTADOS: se analizaron 23 pacientes (65% mujeres, 35% hombres; edad mediana: 71.1 años). Los defectos óseos posteriores a la extracción del implante se clasificaron como F2.T2 en 39.13% de los casos, F1.T2 en 8.69%, y F1.T1 en 52.17%. Se observaron mejoras significativas en la puntuación de la KSS (preoperatoria: 53 puntos, postoperatoria: 79 puntos; p < 0.001). Se registraron tres (13%) complicaciones totales, dos relacionadas directamente con la cirugía, y dos casos requirieron una nueva cirugía de revisión. La tasa de supervivencia a los dos años fue de 91.3%. CONCLUSIÓN: el uso del implante modular con fijación híbrida en la revisión de ATR mostró una alta tasa de supervivencia a dos años, mejoras significativas en las puntuaciones clínicas y baja incidencia de complicaciones a corto plazo. Estos resultados respaldan la eficacia y seguridad de este enfoque, proporcionando resultados clínicos favorables y alta satisfacción del paciente.

Sistema de doble movilidad. La solución francesa en pacientes añosos con fractura intracapsular de cadera y alto riesgo de luxación / Dual mobility system. The French solution in elderly patients with intracapsular hip fracture and high risk of dislocation

OBJETIVO: En la actualidad continúa la controversia respecto al tratamiento quirúrgico más adecuado de la fractura de cuello femoral desplazada en pacientes añosos o con alto riesgo de luxación. En nuestro estudio nos enfocamos en reportar resultados clínicos, funcionales y radiográficos de este tipo de pacientes tratados con artroplastia total de cadera usando el sistema de doble movilidad con un seguimiento mínimo de 2 años. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: En el periodo de enero de 2015 a enero de 2016 los pacientes con fractura del cuello femoral desplazada asistidos en las centrales de emergencia de los hospitales que participaron en el estudio fueron seleccionados. De 137 pacientes, 41 cumplían con uno o más de los criterios de inclusión y aceptaron la indicación terapéutica recomendada. Los pacientes fueron sometidos a artroplastia total de cadera utilizando prótesis con sistema de doble movilidad (cementada o no cementada). Todos los pacientes fueron evaluados con el Mini-Mental State Examination y la distancia de caminata en el preoperatorio, a las 3 y 6 semanas, a los 3 y 6 meses, al año y en años subsecuentes. Las evaluaciones radiográficas fueron programadas a tiempos similares. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron 41 pacientes, con un seguimiento promedio de 2,4 años (rango 2 a 3,2 años). La media de edad fue de 85,2 (rango 80 a 96 años). Cuatro pacientes fallecieron en el periodo de seguimiento por causas no asociadas a la cirugía, con el implante funcionando. Hubo un solo caso de infección a los 8 meses de la cirugía, tratado con una revisión en un tiempo. No se reportaron casos de luxación en esta serie. CONCLUSIÓN: La utilización del sistema de doble movilidad para el tratamiento de fracturas del cuello femoral desplazadas en pacientes con alto riesgo de luxación y añosos ha demostrado buenos resultados clínicos y radiológicos, que fundamentan la indicación sistemática de uso en nuestros servicios

OBJECTIVE: Actually there is a controversy about the treatment of hip fractures on older patients with high risk of dislocation. Our study is focused on report clinico-functional and radiographic results in this population treated with total hip replacement using a dual mobility system after a minimum follow up of 2 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period from January 2015 to January 2016 patients assisted at the Emergency Unit at the participant hospital were recluted for participation. A total of 137 patients were assisted and 41 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and accepted to participate. All patients received a total hip replacement with a dual mobility system (cemented or uncemented). The patients were evaluated with the Mini-Mental State Examination, walking distance test, preop and postop at 3 and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, one year and subsequent years. Radiographic evaluation was scheduled with clinico-functional review. RESULTS: Forty-one patients included, follow up average 2.4 years (range 2 to 3.2 years). Mean age 85.2 (range 80 to 96 years). Four patients died during follow up due to causes not related to the total hip replacement and the implant was functioning. One case have an infection and was revised in one stage procedure. One case have an infection at 8 months follow-up and was revised in one stage procedure. There were no dislocations. CONCLUSION: The use of dual mobility system in this high dislocation risk population has shown good clinical and functional results, and support the sistematic indication in our services

Dual mobility system. The French solution in elderly patients with intracapsular hip fracture and high risk of dislocation. / Sistema de doble movilidad. La solución francesa en pacientes añosos con fractura intracapsular de cadera y alto riesgo de luxación.

OBJECTIVE: Actually there is a controversy about the treatment of hip fractures on older patients with high risk of dislocation. Our study is focused on report clinico-functional and radiographic results in this population treated with total hip replacement using a dual mobility system after a minimum follow up of 2 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period from January 2015 to January 2016 patients assisted at the Emergency Unit at the participant hospital were recluted for participation. A total of 137 patients were assisted and 41 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and accepted to participate. All patients received a total hip replacement with a dual mobility system (cemented or uncemented). The patients were evaluated with the Mini-Mental State Examination, walking distance test, preop and postop at 3 and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, one year and subsequent years. Radiographic evaluation was scheduled with clinico-functional review. RESULTS: Forty-one patients included, follow up average 2.4 years (range 2 to 3.2 years). Mean age 85.2 (range 80 to 96 years). Four patients died during follow up due to causes not related to the total hip replacement and the implant was functioning. One case have an infection and was revised in one stage procedure. One case have an infection at 8 months follow-up and was revised in one stage procedure. There were no dislocations. CONCLUSION: The use of dual mobility system in this high dislocation risk population has shown good clinical and functional results, and support the sistematic indication in our services.

Estudio comparativo radiológico y funcional del abordaje anterior directo versus abordaje posterolateral de cadera / Comparative study of radiological and functional outcomes following a direct anterior approach versus to a posterolateral approach to the hip

Objetivo: Realizar una comparación funcional y radiográfica de los resultados iniciales obtenidos con la utilización de los abordajes anterior directo (AAD) y posterolateral (PL) en la artroplastia total de cadera (ATC). Material y método: Estudio longitudinal prospectivo multicéntrico en 80 pacientes (80ATC). Cuarenta pacientes fueron intervenidos mediante AAD y 40 pacientes mediante abordaje PL. Se recogieron los siguientes parámetros clínicos: anestesia, abordaje, longitud de la incisión cutánea, duración de la cirugía, discrepancia de longitud, dolor, complicaciones, tiempo de ingreso, escala funcional de Harris (HHS) y satisfacción de los pacientes. En cuanto a los parámetros radiográficos, se recogieron ángulo de inclinación acetabular, anteversión acetabular, integración del cotilo, integración y orientación del vástago y longitud del miembro inferior. Resultados: Dolor postoperatorio: AAD 4puntos; PL 4,3puntos. Tamaño incisión: AAD14cm; PL 15cm. Duración media del ingreso hospitalario: AAD 2,8días; PL 3,4días. HHS a las 3semanas: AAD 87,5puntos, PL 84puntos; a los 2meses: AAD 92puntos, PL 91puntos. Se detectó hundimiento del vástago femoral en 4 pacientes AAD y en un paciente PL, y mala alineación en 9 casos del grupo AAD. Conclusiones: Nuestros resultados muestran una leve mejoría inicial del AAD en la recuperación funcional y en el dolor de los pacientes, lo que permite una menor estancia hospitalaria. Esta diferencia se compensa aproximadamente a los 2meses del postoperatorio. Asimismo, se ha detectado un mayor índice de complicaciones en el AAD con el uso de vástagos no cementados estándar

Objective: To compare clinically and radiologically the results obtained using both a direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral (PL) approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Material and methods: Multicentric longitudinal prospective study in 80 patients (80 THA). Forty patients underwent total hip arthroplasty through DAA and 40 through a PL approach. The following clinical parameters were collected: anaesthesia, length of surgical incision, duration of the procedure, lower limb discrepancy, pain, complications, hospitalization time, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and subjective patient satisfaction. Radiological measures collected were acetabular tilt angle, acetabular component version, osteointegration and lower limb length. Results: Postoperative pain: DAA 4points; PL 4.3points. Incision length: DAA 14cm, PL 15cm. Mean hospital stay: DAA 2.8days, PL 3.4days. HHS at 3weeks: DAA 87.5points and PL 84points; at 2months: DAA 92points and PL 91points. Femoral stem subsidence was noticed in 4 patients from DAA and 1 from PL. Malalignment was reported in 9 cases from the DAA group. Conclusions: Our results show an initial advantage of the DAA group regarding functional recovery and pain that enabled shorter hospitalization time. This difference equalled out over 2months following the procedure. Likewise, we detected a greater complication rate in the DAA group using standard cementless stems

Comparative study of radiological and functional outcomes following a direct anterior approach versus to a posterolateral approach to the hip. / Estudio comparativo radiológico y funcional del abordaje anterior directo versus abordaje posterolateral de cadera.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinically and radiologically the results obtained using both a direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral (PL) approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicentric longitudinal prospective study in 80 patients (80 THA). Forty patients underwent total hip arthroplasty through DAA and 40 through a PL approach. The following clinical parameters were collected: anaesthesia, length of surgical incision, duration of the procedure, lower limb discrepancy, pain, complications, hospitalization time, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and subjective patient satisfaction. Radiological measures collected were acetabular tilt angle, acetabular component version, osteointegration and lower limb length. RESULTS: Postoperative pain: DAA 4points; PL 4.3points. Incision length: DAA 14cm, PL 15cm. Mean hospital stay: DAA 2.8days, PL 3.4days. HHS at 3weeks: DAA 87.5points and PL 84points; at 2months: DAA 92points and PL 91points. Femoral stem subsidence was noticed in 4 patients from DAA and 1 from PL. Malalignment was reported in 9 cases from the DAA group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show an initial advantage of the DAA group regarding functional recovery and pain that enabled shorter hospitalization time. This difference equalled out over 2months following the procedure. Likewise, we detected a greater complication rate in the DAA group using standard cementless stems.

Resultados de un vástago con cobertura completa de hidroxiapatita con un seguimiento mínimo de 5 años / Outcomes using wedge stem with full hydroxiapatite coverage with a minimum of 5 years' follow-up

Introducción. La artroplastia total de cadera (ATC) con vástagos no cementados es popular en las últimas décadas. La supervivencia de un implante es crítica, con una tasa de revisión menor al 10% a 10años como límite para su aceptación y comercialización. Objetivos. Analizar los resultados clínico-radiográficos con un vástago en forma de cuña no cementado con recubrimiento completo de hidroxiapatita (HA) y con seguimiento mínimo de 5años. Material y métodos. Estudio prospectivo. Utilización de vástago Element (Exactech) y copa no cementada con inserto crosslink pared posterior elevada y cabeza metálica de 32mm. Se realizó un abordaje posterolateral con retención del músculo piriforme. Seguimiento clínico a las 3 semanas, a los 3 y 6 meses, al año y años subsiguientes. Evaluación radiográfica base en el postoperatorio inmediato y comparación con los controles. Se registraron las complicaciones intraoperatorias y en los seguimientos. Resultados. Ciento catorce ATC en 104 pacientes: 54 mujeres y 50 hombres (52/48%), con seguimiento de 5,7años (rango, 5-6,2años) y con 56,8años de promedio de edad (rango, 42-75años). Evaluación inicial score Merle d’Aubigné pobre con mejora postoperatoria de 6,8 puntos. Score de Harris inicial de 47,3 puntos y, a la última consulta, de 93,1 puntos. Evaluación radiográfica: osteointegración de todos los vástagos. Hundimiento: 6 casos (5,3%) a 3meses de cirugía, promedio de 1,4mm (rango, 0-2,6mm) sin repercusión clínica hasta la actualidad. En 3 casos de hundimiento hubo fracturas intraoperatorias: una del trocánter mayor (se realizó un cerclaje tipo mochila) y 2 por fractura proximal en el área del calcar (tratadas con cerclaje circular). Evaluación subjetiva: 86 casos (82,6%) excelente, 9 pacientes (8,6%) buena, 6 casos (5,9%) satisfactoria y 3 casos (2,9%) pobre. Los resultados pobres coincidieron con pacientes que tuvieron las complicaciones mencionadas. No se detectó dolor femoral anterior. No se produjeron luxaciones o aflojamientos sépticos. No hubo pérdida de pacientes en el período de seguimiento. Todos los implantes se encuentran in situ al momento del último seguimiento. Conclusiones. La evaluación y el seguimiento radiográfico confirman buena osteointegración del vástago. Los resultados clínicos y subjetivos son prometedores. Con una buena técnica quirúrgica y sin complicaciones, el riesgo de aflojamiento aséptico impresiona ser mínimo o ausente (AU)

Introduction. Total Hip Arthroplsty (THA) using uncemented stems is a popular practice in the last decades. The implant survivorship is crtitical and a less than 10% revision at 10 years is been propesed for commercialization and use. Objective. To analyse the clinicoradiological results of an uncemented hydroxiapatite covered wedge stem with a 5 years minimum follow up. Material and methods. Prospective study, patients aged from 21-75years were included. All patients received an Element stem (Exactech) and uncemented cup with crosslink poly and 32 mm metal head, and posterior approach with piriformis retention was used. Scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluation at 3 weeks, 3-6 month, year and subsequent years using Harris Hip Score and Merle d’Aubigné Postel. Intraoperative and during follow up complications were recorded. Results. One hundred and fourteen total hip replacements in 104 patients: 54 females and 50 males (52%/48%). Follow-up of 5.7 years (range, 5-6.2years). Average age 56.8years (range, 42-75years). Clinical evaluation the Merle d’Aubigné score improved 6.8 points and from the initianl Harris Hip Score 47.3 to 93.1 points at last follow up. Radiographic evaluation shows osteointegration in all stems. And in 6 cases (5.3% at 3 months subsidence was detected, average 1.4 mm (range 0-2.6 mm) with no clinical manifestation, 3 cases of subsidence were associated to intraoperative fractures (1 greater trochanter and 2 in the calcar area, all resolved with wire cerclaje). Subjective evaluation: 86 cases (82.6%) excellent, 9 patients (8.6%) good, 6 cases (5.9%) satisfactory and 3 cases (2.9%) poor. All poor results linked to the intraoperative complications. No patient lost during follow up period. No femoral pain dislocation or aseptic or loosening detected. All implants were in situ at last follow up. Conclusions. The radiological results confirm the benefits of this type of stem with good osteointegration. The clinical and subjective results are promising. With good surgical technical and without complications the risk of aseptic loosening should be absent or minimal (AU)

Outcomes using wedge stem with full hydroxiapatite coverage with a minimum of 5 years' follow-up. / Resultados de un vástago con cobertura completa de hidroxiapatita con un seguimiento mínimo de 5 años.

INTRODUCTION: Total Hip Arthroplsty (THA) using uncemented stems is a popular practice in the last decades. The implant survivorship is crtitical and a less than 10% revision at 10 years is been propesed for commercialization and use. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinicoradiological results of an uncemented hydroxiapatite covered wedge stem with a 5 years minimum follow up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study, patients aged from 21-75years were included. All patients received an Element stem (Exactech) and uncemented cup with crosslink poly and 32 mm metal head, and posterior approach with piriformis retention was used. Scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluation at 3 weeks, 3-6 month, year and subsequent years using Harris Hip Score and Merle d'Aubigné Postel. Intraoperative and during follow up complications were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen total hip replacements in 104 patients: 54 females and 50 males (52%/48%). Follow-up of 5.7 years (range, 5-6.2years). Average age 56.8years (range, 42-75years). Clinical evaluation the Merle d'Aubigné score improved 6.8 points and from the initianl Harris Hip Score 47.3 to 93.1 points at last follow up. Radiographic evaluation shows osteointegration in all stems. And in 6 cases (5.3% at 3 months subsidence was detected, average 1.4 mm (range 0-2.6 mm) with no clinical manifestation, 3 cases of subsidence were associated to intraoperative fractures (1 greater trochanter and 2 in the calcar area, all resolved with wire cerclaje). Subjective evaluation: 86 cases (82.6%) excellent, 9 patients (8.6%) good, 6 cases (5.9%) satisfactory and 3 cases (2.9%) poor. All poor results linked to the intraoperative complications. No patient lost during follow up period. No femoral pain dislocation or aseptic or loosening detected. All implants were in situ at last follow up. CONCLUSIONS: The radiological results confirm the benefits of this type of stem with good osteointegration. The clinical and subjective results are promising. With good surgical technical and without complications the risk of aseptic loosening should be absent or minimal.